on
17-Aug-2016 16:48

73,14,34

73,14,34

on
19-Aug-2016 18:16

i think there is a mistake in the question. the pattern is that they are prime numbers written reversed. but the "29" is out of place so it should be "92". and hence the next in the series should be 73 but then maybe i am wrong

i think there is a mistake in the question. the pattern is that they are prime numbers written reversed. but the "29" is out of place so it should be "92". and hence the next in the series should be 73 but then maybe i am wrong

on
20-Aug-2016 12:05

73

73

on
22-Aug-2016 16:02

73

73